Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Protest the Sentencing of Ricardo Palmera Jan. 28


January 2008

Fight Back News Service is circulating the following statement from the National Committee to Free Ricardo Palmera. We urge all our readers to support this campaign.

Protest the Sentencing of Ricardo Palmera Jan. 28

We demand freedom for Colombian revolutionary Ricardo Palmera. The U.S. imprisonment and trials of Ricardo Palmera are a violation of the sovereignty of Colombia. Palmera has done nothing wrong. To the contrary, he is a freedom fighter in the service of the people of Colombia. Palmera fights against the corruption and terror imposed on his country by President Bush and those dreaming of U.S. Empire.

Professor Palmera is a political prisoner of Bush and company. He is held in solitary confinement outside of Washington D.C. - NO family, NO friends, NO reporters, not even his own Colombian lawyer is allowed to visit. Palmera has committed no crime, but only dedicated his whole life to the Colombian people.

Professor Palmera’s trial is bizarre. The first trial ended in a hung jury, so Palmera was retried on the same charges. At the start of the second trial, Judge Hogan had to step down because he was caught cheating with the U.S. prosecutor Ken Kohl. Hogan’s replacement Judge Lamberth refused to allow Palmera any witnesses. At the same time, Judge Lamberth allowed the U.S. prosecutor dozens of witnesses - paid informants, lying convicted drug runners, and corrupt Colombian government officials.

THE ONLY FAIR TRIAL IS NO TRIAL!

Picket line and press conference for Ricardo Palmera’s freedom!
Monday, January 28, 2008, 8:30 AM picket line
9:00 AM press conference

Federal Court Building (333 Constitution Ave NW), Washington, D.C.

For more info contact Tom Burke at 773-844-3612 or Mick Kelly at 612-715-3280
www.freericardopalmera.org

Thursday, January 17, 2008

FARC statement on release of prisoners

January 2008

FARC statement on release of prisoners

Due to the great interest in the release of several detainees by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Colombia’s largest rebel group, Fight Back! is circulating the following FARC statement.

FARC Communiqué in Regards to the Liberation of Clara and Consuelo

1. Honoring our word and commitment, today the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia FARC, hand over Clara Rojas and Consuelo González de Perdomo to the President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, to Senator Piedad Cordova and the international community. If the boy Emmanuel is not in the arms of his mother, it is because President Uribe Vélez has sequestered him in Bogotá. Let him free so that we can all celebrate this event.

2. This humanitarian and unilateral liberation is possible despite the hindrance presented by President Uribe himself, a sworn enemy of the exchange of prisoners and enemy of peace with social justice, as he follows the ideological guidelines of Washington. Raising above the intense military operations of the Patriotic Plan, the seizure of the proofs of life, the capture of the humanitarian messengers who carried them, the sequestering of little Emmanuel in Bogotá, and the absurd intention to exclude the international humanitarian commission from the facilitation, we have taken this first encouraging step that invites to think about the possibility of peace in Colombia.

3. The efforts must now be directed at obtaining the military clearing of Pradera and Florida as the stage for the dialogue government-FARC for the agreement and the materialization of the exchange to make possible the liberation of all the prisoners in control of the contending forces, of those captives in the mountain and the imprisoned guerrillas in the jails of the regime, including Sonia and Simón. Our will is unquestionable. Let's not forget that in the recent past we unilaterally released 304 military and police officers, captured in combat. The handover of Clara and Consuelo we carry out today reaffirms our disposition.

4. The fact is that we are a belligerent force awaiting recognition by the governments of the world. This step would smooth the winding path of the Colombia people in their search for peace. Ours is a legitimate struggle. It is upheld by the universal right that all the peoples of the world have to raise against oppression. Our father, the Liberator Simón Bolivar teaches us that, when power is oppressive, virtue has the right to overwhelm it, and that the virtuous man rises against the oppressive and unbearable authority to replace it with a kind and respected one. And this is, indeed, the FARC's endeavor.

5. President Chávez, thank you very much. The world does not doubt that your immense heart beats sincerely for the peace of Colombia and the redemption of the peoples. We also thank the governments and personalities of the world who have surrounded him without reservations in this noble effort. And our special thanks to the brave people of Venezuela for their support and brotherhood. To the relatives of the prisoners and the friends of the humanitarian exchange our call to persist. We will obtain the exchange.

Secretariat, Central High Command of the FARC
Mountains of Colombia, January 10 of 2008

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Movie Review: The Great Debaters

January 2008

Movie Review: The Great Debaters

The movie The Great Debaters is based on the true story of Melvin B. Tolson, a poet and professor from the 1930s. In the movie, Tolson’s character is that of an energetic professor at Wiley College in Marshall, Texas who organizes the school debate team. That debate team goes on to debate white colleges, to a mostly undefeated season where they won a 1935 debate against Harvard, the reigning national champion.

The setting of the movie - 1935 in Marshall, Texas - catches what it was like for African-Americans in the South at that time. During one scene in the movie, the students with Professor Tolson drive straight by the lynching of a Black man. As they were staring up at the burning body, the white mob turns their attention towards the students in the car. The students quickly realize he was lynched for the crime of being a Black man in Texas.

The debates throughout the movie provide commentary on such topics as child labor, the integration of the university and the use of civil non-violent disobedience. In the last debate against Harvard about civil disobedience, the audience can see the beginnings of the young James Farmer Jr., who in the movie argued for civil disobedience. The real James Farmer Jr. was a key civil rights leader in the 1960s who founded the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and helped lead the Freedom Rides in the South, where they tested supposedly desegregated buses and were met with violence from the state.

The movie depicted Tolson as a communist who, along with other Black and white activists, was trying to organize sharecroppers into a union. The sheriff’s office tried desperately to break apart the workers, using brute force and raiding meetings so that the workers would not unionize. The government, along with the bosses, was completely against any form of union that would help the sharecroppers receive better wages and better working conditions. The sheriff was also worried that the communists were coming down to “stir up trouble between our whites and our coloreds,” and he wanted the status quo of segregation and inequality to stay exactly the way it was.

This movie is a must-see for all who are interested in the Jim Crow South and progressive politics. The speeches given in the debates are very powerful and really showcase what the debates around segregation and capitalism were at the time. The Great Debaters does a fantastic job of personalizing the beginnings of future civil rights leaders, and is a powerful testament against segregation. Although Jim Crow was formally ended in the South, racism and national oppression are still very much real. Nooses are being hung from trees in order to intimidate workers and students, women are being raped and tortured based on their nationality, and the victims of the Katrina hurricane are still left with no justice. Black people in the South need political power, liberation and the right to self-determination in order to achieve real and lasting equality.


Running Time: 123 Minutes
Director: Denzel Washington
Written by: Robert Eisele
2007 Rated: PG-13

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Jose Maria Sison: Expect worse economic conditions in 2008

January 2008

Fight Back News Service is circulating the following press statement from Professor Jose Maria Sison, chief political consultant of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. The statement deals with economic developments in the Philippines and the United States.

Jose Maria Sison:
Expect worse economic conditions in 2008

Prof. Jose Maria Sison, chief political consultant of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines, declared today his expectations of worse economic conditions in the Philippines in 2008. His discussion of these bleak prospects followed up his previous expose of the degradation of the Philippine economy by the Arroyo regime in line with the US-dictated policy of “neoliberal” globalization.

Prof. Sison said, “The underdevelopment and chronic crisis of the Philippine economy make it extremely vulnerable to the current financial crisis and recessionary trend being generated globally from the US. These have started to have a severe adverse impact on the Philippines. The Filipino people will undergo unprecedented economic and social suffering in terms of rising unemployment, decreasing real income, soaring prices of basic goods and deteriorating social services.

“The US and global demand for both the Philippine raw-material exports and semi-manufactured re-exports will contract because of the continuing industrial decline, reduced employment and recessionary trend in all the imperialist countries. US economic growth is expected to go down to less than two per cent from the usual level of around 3 per cent. The thirty OECD countries are expected to have an average growth rate of less than 3 per cent from the usual level of more than 5 per cent.”

Prof. Sison pointed out , “The US consumer market has drastically contracted because of the decline of regular employment and incomes as a result of the series of attacks on the US working class. Under the piratical banner of neoliberalism, the monopoly bourgeoisie has pushed down the wage level, cut back the social benefits and eroded the democratic rights of the workers. It has undermined the US consumer market and caused the crisis of overproduction to recur.

“And yet many of the workers were inveigled to engage in stock speculation through easy credit and to let investment managers raid their pension funds during the high-tech bubble in 1995-2000. The bigger scam came when more workers and other people were drawn to far easier credit for consumption during the housing bubble from 2001 onwards. In the wake of the ongoing mortgage meltdown, the American consumers are without savings and are deeply indebted.

“The mortgage meltdown has acquired global dimensions because US mortgages were repackaged and sold as financial products under such fancy names as “structured investment vehicles” and “asset-backed securities” to foreign banks and investment houses. Since August this year there has been an epidemic of write offs and write downs, involving the evaporation of more than USD 400 billion. This is expected to result in the tightening of international credit by USD two trillion as federal and commercial banks become more prudent in lending.”

Prof. Sison explained further the US financial crisis, “But the financial crisis generated globally by the US is not only about the mortgage meltdown and the necessity of writing down or writing off “asset-backed securities” by foreign banks. The US national debt has risen so fast from the level of USD 5.7 trillion in 2001 to USD 9.1 trillion at present. It is expected to rise to the level of USD 10 trillion before Bush steps down. The US has abused confidence in the US dollar as the global currency .

“The US trade deficit has rapidly grown to the annual level of USD 850 billion because of the US industrial decline and outsourcing of consumer goods, such as those produced in China, India and Southeast Asia. The US budget deficit has also grown rapidly because of the tax cuts to corporations and the wealthy and the unbridled spending for the Pentagon and the wars of aggression. The Pentagon budget has risen to the annual level of USD 600 billion and the costs of the Iraq war have gone far beyond the officially admitted level of USD 500 billion for “operations” and are already in the range of USD one to two trillion if related costs are taken into account.

“The abuse of international credit by the US to cover trade and budget deficits has led to a rapid decline of the dollar and to pressures for an international credit crunch. The dollar decline is generating defensive responses from such big US creditors like Japan, China and the oil producing countries. To play safe, they are gradually reducing their dollar positions in favor of other currencies or a basket of currencies. The financial crisis of the US is serious enough to start undermining the standing of the US as the sole superpower in economic and politico-military terms, as the main engine of global economic growth and as the global market of last resort.”

Prof. Sison stressed, “In 2008 the underdeveloped and semifeudal Philippine economy will face serious problems in relation to the export of raw materials and the re-export of low value added semi-manufactures in a shrinking global market as well as in relation to the securing of new loans and selling bonds to service the accumulated debt and finance the import of oil and other critically needed goods. The international credit standing of the reactionary state will be further degraded as its difficulties to repay the public debt and collect revenues become obvious.

“As the international reserves will decrease conspicuously, the Arroyo regime will not be able to conjure the illusion of economic growth and raise the value of the peso against the US dollar and other major currencies. In the real economy of the Philippines, the working people and middle social strata will be beset by intensified exploitation, increased poverty and misery and the heavier weight of oppression. The social discontent and people's resistance will further spread and intensify.”

New Jersey: Case against Plainfield 4 Dismissed

December 2007

New Jersey:
Case against Plainfield 4 Dismissed


Plainfield, NJ - The People’s Organization for Progress (POP) called a rally here, Dec. 15 to protest the Nov. 19 arrest of four of its members. The 4 were peacefully rallying against police brutality and violence in the community when they were arrested, photographed and charged with unlawful assembly.

About 60 people turned up at the arrest site on Dec. 15 to continue the struggle against this outrageous violation of civil and constitutional rights. Plainfield Mayor Sharon Robinson Briggs approached the group. To the cheers of the participants she read a statement that all charges would be dropped, the records expunged and the photos shredded. “Everyone has the right to fight for their civil rights,” she said.

POP had demanded that any city ordinances in conflict with rights of free speech be dropped. Bennet Zurofsky, attorney for the 4, said, “Police often treat people who demonstrate in the streets as people who are only marginally behaving in a legal manner, who should be grateful for whatever they’re given, when in fact, it’s the law of the nation.” He will meet with city officials to discuss changes in the ordnances to protect demonstrators.

The repressiveness of the G.W. Bush era is a sign of weakness and crisis in the U.S. social order, not of strength. The victory of POP and the Plainfield 4 is due to the power of the people. When the people stand together they are stronger than the Bush forces.

PFLP leader passes away

January 2008

PFLP leader passes away

Fight Back News Service is reprinting the following statement from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) on the passing of Dr. Ahmad Maslamani, an important leader in the fight to free Palestine.

Farewell, Comrade Leader Dr. Ahmad Maslamani

On Monday morning, January 7, 2008, Comrade Leader Dr. Ahmad Maslamani, member of the Central Committee of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, passed in a Ramallah hospital after suffering a heart attack. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine mourns the loss of a true leader who has been a servant of his people and his comrades since a very early age. Comrade Ahmad is the co-founder and director of the Health Work Committees in the West Bank. His death is a great loss for the Palestinian national movement, particularly in the field of health and public service.

Comrade Ahmad was arrested by the occupation forces on numerous occasions, spending a total of seven years in Israeli detention and prisons, and throughout, he demonstrated the utmost commitment and determination in confronting the occupation. Comrade Ahmad Maslamani belongs to the Maslamani family, who are widely known and respected in Jerusalem for their sacrifices for freedom of the Palestinian people.

Born in Jerusalem in 1958, Comrade Ahmad studied in al-Umma schools, before traveling to Romania, where he received his medical degree. In the mid-1980s, he returned to Palestine and was immediately detained. His role in the first and second intifada was very prominent, where he personally engaged in treatment of the injured and the establishment of health clinics throughout impoverished sectors, particularly in refugee camps. His last arrest was on September 9, 2005 and his detention continued until March 14, 2006. His many years of experience in detention and prison, where he suffered from torture and ill treatment, had lasting effects on his physical health.

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine extends its deepest condolences to Comrade Dr. Nufuz Maslamani, his wife, and to Ahmad's family and comrades, and its pledge to continue to be faithful to his path of resistance until the liberation of Palestine.

Not So Happy New Year: U.S. Economy on the Edge of a Recession

January 2008

Not So Happy New Year:
U.S. Economy on the Edge of a Recession

San Jose, CA - New economic data released in early January 2008 showed that the U.S. economy was on the edge of a recession in December. On Jan. 2, the Institute for Supply Management reported that the manufacturing sector shrank in December. Their index fell to 47.7 from 50.8 in November, the lowest level since April of 2003. Then on Jan. 4, the Department of Labor said that the unemployment rate rose to 5% in December, from 4.7% the month before, the biggest one-month jump since the last recession in 2001. In the same report, the Labor Department also said that only 18,000 new jobs were created in December, the weakest number since August of 2003.

In addition to jump in unemployment, there was also another increase in the number of workers who are working less than full-time. In December, there were 3.1 million part-time workers due to slack business conditions, up almost 20% from December of 2006. These workers are not counted in the official unemployment statistics, but workers facing shorter hours feel the pain of smaller paychecks and sometimes loss of part or all of their benefits. Increases in the number of part-time workers due to a slower economy often foreshadows more layoffs down the road, as businesses often try to cut workers’ hours before cutting their jobs completely.

The jump in unemployment hit African Americans and Latinos especially hard. While the unemployment rate for white workers rose 0.2%, from 4.2% to 4.4%, the unemployment rate rose three times as fast, or 0.6% for Blacks and Latinos, to 9.0% and 6.3% respectively. African American teenagers were hit especially hard, with a 5% jump in the unemployment rate, from 29.7% in November to 34.7% in December. In contrast, the unemployment rate for white teenagers was less than half as much, and actually fell slightly from November to December.

Recessions in the United States typically develop in three stages. The first stage is when overproduction of either new homes (as in the last two years) and/or business buildings and machinery (which happened before the last recession in 2001) starts to drag on the economy. The second stage is when the slowdown spreads to other sectors, leading to lower corporate profits and then less hiring and more layoffs. The point where the total number of jobs starts to shrink has traditionally marked the official beginning of a recession. The third stage is when the falling number of jobs leads households to cut back on consumer purchases and falling tax revenues lead to cuts in state and local government spending, marking a full-blown recession, with rising inventories of unsold goods going hand-in-hand with growing numbers of jobless workers and cuts in schools, libraries and other government services.

While the rate of price increases, or inflation, tends to fall in most recessions as businesses find it harder to raise prices, this is not always the case. During the 1970s, there were times of ‘stagflation,’ where a recession was combined with rising inflation. While many blame this on the price of oil, even more important was the falling value of U.S. dollar, which made imports of all kinds, not just oil, more expensive. With the dollar falling and record amounts of imports, it is no surprise that price increases have been coming faster and faster, squeezing workers’ purchasing power just as unemployment is rising.
During almost all past recessions, households have cut back on borrowing for consumer purchases. With household debt at near-record levels and with banks less and less willing to lend due to rising defaults on home mortgages, this is likely to happen again in the next recession. But the impact on the economy and on household standards of living could be much worse than usual because more and more workers have already turned to borrowing to pay for health care, food, transportation and other necessities.

Corporations and their politicians have also whittled down the power of labor unions and the social safety net that once provided more protection during recessions. In 2006, only 13.1% of workers were represented by labor unions, less than half of the rate in the 1970s. At the same time, today only about one in three unemployed workers are collecting unemployment benefits, because of changes in the law and in corporate hiring that makes it more difficult for jobless workers to collect benefits.

The coming year will be challenging for working people. Corporations are stepping up layoffs while cutting back on hiring, while maintaining the perks and privileges of their executives. California’s Republican governor is preparing for a 10% across the board spending cut that will mainly affect schools, health care and welfare, while vowing to keep tax cuts for the well-to-do. Renters are being evicted from foreclosed houses while record numbers of homes stand empty. More and more children will be losing their health insurance as their parents are laid off, while the Bush administration refuses to expand health care for children, while spending billions on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. This contrast between working people and the rich, between human needs and corporate profits, and between politicians’ claims to be “for the people” and their anti-people actions, are part and parcel of a capitalist system. Just changing the party in power in Washington, D.C. is not enough. What is needed is a grassroots fight back to make the rich pay and to hold the politicians accountable to the people.

UIC Workers Decide to Take Strike Authorization Vote

January 2008

UIC Workers Decide to Take Strike Authorization Vote

Chicago, IL - Clerical and administrative workers at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) will be taking a strike authorization vote in early January. Over two years have passed since their last raise, and the 1500 employees, including workers at sites in Rockford and Peoria, are fed up. The workers are members of SEIU (Service Employees International Union) Local 73. Management presented a settlement offer to their bargaining committee on Nov. 14. According to Jeff Dexter, lead negotiator for Local 73, that offer falls short of what the workers need.

“They want us to learn to live with less.” That’s how Denise King sees it. King had just finished marching outside the meeting of the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois the same day as the settlement offer was presented. She was one of 22 workers from UIC who had traveled to the university’s Springfield campus to confront the Board of Trustees.

In addition to the clerical and administrative group, 400 technical workers at the university’s medical center have also gone without a contract raise for more than two years. Besides wages, workers are seeking language that gives them job security against replacement of civil service jobs and equal wages for workers on all campuses of the university.

University’s Racism, Sexism Hit

Joining the Local 73 members, a student activist from UIC appeared at the Board meeting. Sussan Navabi of Students for a Democratic Society spoke during the public comment section. She accused the university of having a history of discriminatory employment practices. This came to the attention of students when 35 prominent faculty members published a letter addressed to UIC Chancellor Manning. They criticized the drawn out contract negotiations for the nearly 2000 workers, mostly Blacks and Latinos, and mostly women.

Sussan explained that letter “… prompted me to do some research into the history of inequality at UIC - two things which don’t belong in the same sentence, but unfortunately have and continue to.” The Board had to sit through a list of examples of discrimination, including the 35 years that Black and Latino workers at the campus in Chicago were paid $1 or $2 an hour less than the mostly white workers in the flagship campus in Urbana.

Local 73 members, together with members of the Graduate Employees Organization from UIC, and supportive faculty members from the Springfield campus, cheered Sussan’s remarks, and then marched outside, chanting and singing.

Diana Perez, another clerical worker from UIC, was fired up after the action. “This was my first protest, but I’m prepared to come out again, and to keep fighting.” On the trip back to Chicago, Denise King continued, “We just got equal wages five years ago. Now they’re not offering us enough to stay up with the cost of living. It’s unacceptable.”